PBCN Position on Senate Bills on Breast Cancer

Philippine Senate Committee on Health

Public Hearing on SBN 1873

10am, Tuesday, 20 May 2014

I am registering my strongest objection to Senate Bill No. 1873 authored by Sen. Trillanes, as well as SBN 2114 authored by Sen. Santiago and SBN 354 authored by Sen. Legarda.

Our country has had the highest increase in breast cancer incidence rate worldwide for the past 30 years, where today, is the highest in Asia and 11^th highest worldwide. One in every 13 women will get breast cancer which is a serious and urgent public health epidemic that has never been fully addressed by government. To even aggravate matters, SBN 1873 and SBN 354 will further worsen the situation by opening the floodgates, leading thousands of innocent victims to the medical-pharmaceutical slaughterhouse of slash, poison and burn.  

According to the US Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program, an estimated 30% of all breast cancer cases (both invasive and DCIS) are considered to be over diagnosed and over treated. Over diagnosis is diagnosis of cancers that would not have presented within the life of the patient. Overtreatment can occur in two ways—either in over diagnosis, where any treatment is unnecessary, or with the administration of more aggressive therapies than is necessary. It has recently been estimated that one to three deaths from overtreatment occur for every one breast cancer death avoided.

Despite the PBCN’s concerns submitted during Public Hearings to both Houses of Congress since 2010, government has not taken any concrete action to curtail the most common form of cancer that has caused tremendous misery, sufferings and untimely deaths to thousands of women –young or old, rich or poor, learned or unlearned, with or without child, Christian or Muslim, urban or rural. Instead, the Department of Health and PhilHealth have even embarked on programs that have even worsened the breast cancer crisis.

In May 2011, the Department of Health (DOH) and the Philippine Cancer Society launched a medicine access program through a patient navigation scheme targeting indigent women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. Health Secretary Ona said that cancer is a costly disease, with the cost of medicines and treatment way out of reach for many of our people. The scheme would provide medicine entitlements to poor and vulnerable sectors for priority disease such as cancer. Has the Senate ever looked into the progress or failure of this program?

In July 2012, Philhealth launched the Z Benefit Package, providing for P100,000 for the entire treatment for early breast cancer. But in reality, PhilHealth members prefer going to private hospitals rather than any government hospital. Majority of  patients in government hospitals seek free medical treatment but are not PhilHealth members. Has the Senate ever reviewed the progress or failure of this program?

  

Participating in above-mentioned breast cancer treatment programs were the East Avenue Medical Center (EAMC), the Jose Reyes Memorial Medical Center (JRMMC), the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) and the Rizal Medical Center. PhilHealth also includes contracted government hospitals in each region. Has the Senate ever made an investigation on the success or failure rates of all these hospitals in their respective treatment of breast cancer?

Without knowing and validating diagnostic and treatment success or failure rates, this August Body is now intending to fund another “white elephant” in supposedly addressing a known environmental disease? Despite the fact that Philhealth has a gigantic reserve fund of Php117 Billion to fund the Z Benefit Package, why does SBN 1873 want to allocate additional funds?  Is this another Napoles scam in the making in the guise of addressing a public health crisis by exploiting breast cancer? Or is this another diversion of funds for the coming presidential elections, similar to when PhilHealth spent a large amount for TV Ads for the former PGMA in the 2004 elections?

Going back to PhilHealth’s Z Benefit Package for breast cancer:

1.      How are patients diagnosed with breast cancer? By mammograms? Is the Senate Committee on Health aware that mammography is now under extreme doubt as to whether it is truly reliable and whether mammography has significantly saved lives? Very recent studies, most notable of which was the 25 Year Canadian Study which concluded that annual mammography in women aged 40-59 does not reduce mortality from breast cancer and 22% of screen detected invasive breast cancers were over-diagnosed. In a 10 year German study, it showed that mammography did more harm and had negligible benefits.  The Swiss Medical Board acknowledged that there was no evidence to suggest that overall mortality was affected while emphasizing the harm of mammography  — in particular, false positive test results and the risk of over diagnosis.

2.      What is PhilHealth’s definition of Early Stage Breast Cancer because in its selection criteria were stated Stage 0 up to– Stage 3A?  It seems PhilHealth does not even know what early stage breast cancer is.

3.      What are the safeguards against over diagnosis and over treatment?  Many cases are of the DCIS type (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ) which is non-invasive and when left untreated, will in many cases not develop into a  life-threatening disease.

4.      Why are only specific chemo drugs included in the list? Is it because they are the most effective, the cheapest or the only ones available? Worst of all is if these particular drugs are in need of human experiment or about to be phased out!  For example, Avastin was approved by the USFDA for metastatic breast cancer in 2004 only to be revoked in 2011because there was no evidence that it extended life or improved quality of life while causing severe adverse reactions. 

5.      What would be the standard treatment since medical institutions vary in their  respective approaches to breast cancer? For the same breast cancer patient, opinions vary between surgeons and oncologists and between surgeons themselves and oncologists themselves.  

  

So why then will all the above mentioned Senate Bills be enacted and funded when it is very clear that more harm than good will happen? It is imperative that our Senators conduct a deeper inquiry on WHY our country has a breast cancer epidemic and what must be legislated to truly address this public health crisis – not by seeking a cure but focusing on the environmental causes of breast cancer.       

Presently severely tarnished by the pork barrel, the Senate can possibly redeem  itself by enacting laws to protect all women from the scourge of breast cancer, a few of which are the following which will not cost a centavo:

    

1.      STOP mandatory annual chest x-rays for all government employees and make it optional for companies and schools during pre-employment and pre-enrollment. This alone will drastically reduce breast cancer because all women regardless of health status are being unnecessary exposed regularly to at least 1,000 millirads of radiation.

2.      STOP the use of hormonal contraceptives in its population control program because breast cancer is a hormonal disease. Women will not be placed at risk of breast cancer when the use of other methods such as condoms and rhythm method are encouraged instead.  

3.      STOP operations of air-water-soil contaminating industries regardless of environmental clearances - specially identified mining operations that continue to spill cyanide and mercury in the waterways of our country.

4.       STOP the use of triclosan and parabens in all productions of various cosmetics and bath soaps/shampoos among other common consumer products. A Safety Chemical Act needs to be legislated to keep our people healthy and not be at risk of developing cancer from these identified carcinogenic substances.

      Danny Meneses

      President

      Philippine Breast Cancer Network

SIGN THE ONLINE PETITION  now to junk all pending Senate Bills on Breast Cancer. We can no longer be silent!

The Philippines has a breast cancer epidemic

October, breast cancer carnival month

When October ends, will the pink carnival also end? Nope, because breast cancer will continue to dominate the fear of every woman in the Philippines where 1 in 13 will get the disease. The show goes on.....

As aptly said by Rosa Francia Meneses during the 1999 World Conference on Breast Cancer in Ottawa, “The greatest risk of getting breast cancer tomorrow is being born today in a developing country. The greatest risk of not surviving breast cancer today is being a woman in the Philippines."

In the Philippines, the Department of Health has more than once embarked on major breast cancer programs since 20 years ago. None has made any major inroad as seen by the country’s registering the highest growth in incidence rate worldwide while having the 12^th highest mortality rate. Only recently, the government’s Philippine Health Insurance Corporation opened the doors to more over-diagnosis and over-treatments of breast cancer by providing treatment funds for its qualified members.

And at the legislative levels of government, no bill has been written for the prevention of this environmental disease. All bills proposed were on early detection thru mammography – clearly riding this public health issue from a medical point of view and NOT on a people’s point of view, which is “we do not want to get breast cancer!” 

Media has even made itself part of the carnival by featuring the latest treatments, even alternative ones. All the 3 major television networks more than once took contact with the PBCN for their respective features for breast cancer month. However, the PBCN saw no reason to be part of the "carnival" - the glamorization, commercialization and misinformation. Either they wanted personalities with breast cancer to attract viewers, prop up the medical-pharmaceutical industry or present early detection as a preventive measure. It was best and prudent for the PBCN no to be used as a decor or worse, to be misrepresented to the public. All were grossly lacking in research and journalism depth. I challenged them to make a powerful feature on the risks and dangers of annual chest x-rays and mammograms but I knew none would take me upon it. So don't think that all the talk on breast cancer seen on television is reliable - they will simply go through the motions with not much substance.

So who will benefit with the October breast cancer awareness month? The medical—pharmaceutical-supplement network industry! Even a supposedly conscientious company has allowed itself to be used which would likewise benefit themselves. The entire awareness blah-blah-blah will simply scare women to seek medical solutions without addressing how they got it in the first place. And why would it be important for every patient to understand her environmental exposures which led to her breast cancer? Because her daughters, sisters, relatives, neighbors and co-workers will one day also get breast cancer – not from the genes but because of environmental risk exposures!

The PBCN has been observing several patients from specific areas but not limited to Angeles City (Pampanga), Guihulngan (Negros Oriental) and Bacoor (Cavite). What is similar to all is their ground water supply which is most definitely contaminated with carcinogens from different sources.

Then as far as occupational hazards would be the high incidence rate among government female workers – specifically public school teachers. The required annual chest x-rays have only done harm by exposing their breasts to repeated radiation particularly during their periods of vulnerability.

There is no such thing as early detection. It takes 5 to 10 years before the first symptoms of breast cancer are manifested. So-called long term survivors either had no cancer in the very first place (over diagnosis) or had non-aggressive types such as DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ) which was never life-threatening even without treatment.

Mammography is a medical risk factor for eventually getting breast cancer. Women are being told year in and year out that they are clear from the disease, only waiting for the time to be told, “I’m sorry Ma’m but you now have breast cancer,”

The October carnival happens every year but the tragedy of breast cancer must stop.
NO to mammography!

15 years of breast cancer advocacy in the Philippines

It has now been 15 years since Rosa Francia-Meneses established the Philippine Breast Cancer Network as a direct result of the 1^st World Conference on Breast Cancer held in Kingston, Ontario in 1997.

The PBCN pays special tribute to Andrea Martin from the USA, who had devoted her life to the global movement for the eradication of breast cancer and who was a very special friend of the PBCN.  We likewise give special recognition to the following who have maintained the course and pursue in this quest: North America - Sharon Batt, Barbara Brenner, Judy Brady, Devra Davis, Samuel Epstein, Nancy Evans, Ann Fonfa, Jackie Manthorne, Karen Miller, Sandra Steingraber and Laura Weinberg; Europe - Laura Potts, Helen Lynn and Annie Sasco; and Japan - Akiko Domoto and Kimiko Goldberg

But as these persons have been trailblazers in their respective countries, our organizations all face a lacking of new faces of dynamism and resolve, of 2^nd liners who will continue what was started in that historical 1997 Kingston Conference. But without a doubt, there are already newly-diagnosed women out there who have already picked up the baton. 

The PBCN has only been able to persist because it is the only breast cancer organization with a completely patient’s perspective that is led by a man who will not yet die. The burden of advocacy on a patient, most especially in the Philippines is not only demanding of her time and health but breast cancer activism in itself has yet to be accepted and recognized by society and governance.

If not for personal donations from both patients and supporters, the PBCN would have already succumbed to the cancer industry with all the offers of partnerships and assistance from the medical-pharmaceutical sectors as well as grandstanding politicians. This is the reality of territory the PBCN has been in since 15 years ago – yet though it would be simply practical just to survive, the PBCN has always relied on divine intervention and to quote Goethe, “The moment one definitely commits oneself, the Providence also moves. All sorts of things occur to help which would not have otherwise have happened. A whole stream of events flow from that decision, bringing all kinds of unforeseen incidents, meetings and material assistance which no one could have foreseen. Whatever one can do or dream one can, do it. Boldness has genius, power and magic. Do it now.”

August 28^th was the 15^th year of the PBCN and also the 60^th birthday of its founding President. I was able to attend mass, but on television. It was for a simple yet great public servant who perished from a plane crash and captured the hearts and minds of the entire nation. He had dreams that did not fit into the political realities in the country but held steady since more than 20 years ago – he had no idea whether his efforts would go anywhere. Are there others like him?

Yes there are! Two days before, I accompanied my daughter and her classmates undertake a cultural research visit to a small and obscure town in Laguna province. They were all amazed at how the town has maintained its cultural heritage and how the entire community is starting to progress. Then they were shocked to see the month-long waist-deep flood waters that remain and of all places, where the town Mayor and his family reside. Yes, this unassuming mayor of Pila, Laguna is another Jesse Robredo in the making.

Why did I have to mention this?  Because just like these devoted public officials who kept on with their “impossible dream” ….. the PBCN after 15 years of breast cancer advocacy and all its accompanying personal sacrifices, I know deep inside that something’s got to give! 

The PBCN’s advocacy for the prevention and ultimate eradication of breast cancer did not end with the death of Rosa Francia-Meneses.  As silent as every woman copes and confronts with her life-threatening disease, so does the PBCN grapple to stay alive. Despite having lost its recovery center in Tiaong, Quezon aggravated with the unsolved cold-blooded murder of its caretaker, the PBCN continues to provide care and management for women afflicted or suspected to have breast cancer whenever, wherever and however possible.  

Breast cancer is today a national public health epidemic – this is the reality. But the truth is that breast cancer can be prevented! 

The reality is that the medical-pharmaceutical industry continues to mislead the public in believing that early detection prevents breast cancer. But the truth is that mammography causes breast cancer!

The reality is that the PBCN is in dire need of funds. But the truth is that firm resolve and not money has kept the PBCN alive and kicking the past 15 years.

To face reality, one can just opt to be practical. But to be real, one just has to be true.

“Freedom from Breast Cancer!”

  

Ang Hinaharap (Upfront)

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death of women in the entire world today. More than a million women are afflicted every year with North America having the highest incidence rate with one out of eight women getting the disease. Next comes the northeastern European countries followed by Australia and New Zealand. Our country should be proud because we are in the Top Ten Breast Cancer Hotspots of the world! In fact, we have the highest incidence rate in Asia - much, much higher than China or Japan.

Yet we are not a highly industrialized as the USA, nor are we agriculturally productive as Australia, nor do we have a huge wide area of land with a population as that of China. In fact our country is even an archipelago surrounded by the China Sea and Pacific Ocean. 

The Hereditary Factor is Misleading

If we are to believe medical science, Filipinos must then have a genetic predisposition for breast cancer. Despite our different dialects, we must somehow be related to one another to have a high degree of hereditary factor because breast cancer is afflicting all women from as far north as Batanes to as far south as Tawi-Tawi.  In fact, breast cancer today tops all cancers for both men and women. Because of this epidemic situation, our Department of Health has had a Breast Cancer Desk for more than 15 years – unfortunately just that - a desk.

So, does it have something to do with urbanization? Nope! The Cordillera Autonomous Region and the National Capitol Region both have cancer as the 3^rd leading cause of mortality. Population density? Nope! CAR has the lowest in the country with less than a hundred per square km., while the NCR has almost 15,000/ sq.km. Poverty? Nope! In the NCR, cities with the high concentrations of urban poor have similar incidence rates of cancer as cities with the low concentrations of urban poor.  Education? Nope! We have as much affliction among well-educated women as uneducated women. Being childless? Not at all! Having children does not prevent breast cancer, as several cases have been diagnosed shortly after having given birth..

What about Religion? Maybe so, but it isn’t because of spirituality. Muslims don’t eat pork while Christians do and this could probably be a reason why the former are less afflicted. So maybe cancer comes with what we eat? Actually, mounting evidences in the past decade of breast cancer advocacy in North America have clearly established the environmental link to breast cancer with as much as 80% of breast cancer cases having been due to the environmental – meaning what we eat, what we drink and what we breath.

  

Breast cancer is a hormonal disease, particularly involving estrogen. There have been identified specific chemical groups that are estrogen copycats. Since most of the estrogen receptor sites are located in the breast area, the lifetime exposure of a woman to foreign environmental estrogens increases her chances of getting breast cancer. It takes 5-10 years before the first symptoms appear. The longer a woman lives in a toxic environment, the greater the risk of getting breast cancer. So do we chop off the breasts once a woman is born? Do we just remove all her reproductive organs as a preventive measure? Do we just find ways for her glands to stop the production of estrogen? To what extent will we interfere with a woman’s body?

Medicine and science has never been challenged as it is today.  The advent of breast cancer advocacy, which puts forward a patient’s perspective as opposed to a non-patient’s point of view has resulted in a shifting paradigm.

Breast Cancer is Unacceptable

What is causing breast cancer in the Philippines? Enough evidence exists to raise serious concern on the environmental link to breast cancer to make this a priority for investigation and evidence-based regulatory action.

Why is cancer the leading cause of death in Central Luzon? Why does Pampanga, particularly Angeles City have the highest incidence rate of breast cancer in the entire country? The undetermined volume of “Agent Orange”, a chemical used in the Vietnam War by the United States were stocked and flown from the US Air Base. The legacy of Agent Orange has affected the reproductive health of the people of Pampanga, particularly women and children resulting in numerous cases of leukemia, child birth defects and breast cancer. Dioxin is one of the most toxic substance ever created by humans.

What about the Cordillera Autonomous Region? Despite being in the highlands, the soil, water and air supply have been severely affected by many years of mercury and cyanide from gold mining and the continuing practice of pesticides in the vegetable growing areas. At least 10 tons of mercury are released by the entire mining industry annually into the environment. Guihulngan, a very small and sleepy town 100 kms north of Dumaguete has a very high rate of breast cancer. Just across this sleepy town is Atlas Mining, now shut down due to environmental damages. The 6.9 MG earthquake that hit Guihulngan on February 2012 have most likely released and further caused the spread of mercury and cyanide that had accumulated over the years in the water table of this town. Expect an increase of breast cancer in Guihulngan and nearby areas in the coming years!

And the National Capitol Region? Surrounded by the one of the most polluted and contaminated bodies of waters in the entire world – Manila Bay, Pasig River and Laguna Lake – it wouldn’t be difficult to understand why breast cancer has become an epidemic. San Francisco and New York have the highest rates of breast cancer in the world and numerous studies have shown the toxicity of their bodies of water, primarily caused by toxic dump sites five decades ago. The typhoon on August 2012 brought back to the tourist boulevard of Manila Bay all the trash for the world to see.   

What is even most particular to the Philippines is the government’s population control program of oral and inject able contraceptives.  Thousands upon thousands of women have been put to great risk with the early and prolonged use of the pill, undeniably a risk factor for breast cancer. Furthermore, numerous women are required chest x-rays for pre-employment, pre-enrollment and annual check-up’s as against selective screening. The supposed minimal amount of radiation cannot be discounted because it is never dose-related but a matter of timing of exposure. These periodic amounts radiation of women’s breasts have put so many at great risk.   

Population, Poverty and Pollution

As our country grapples with a sinking economy that has impoverished the vast majority of our people, health safety has become a class privilege in the pursuit of work. Thousands of migrants to urban settlers have had to live in subhuman conditions, eat unhealthy foods, drink contaminated water and toil in unsafe working environments. Thousands of the rural population have had to allow the devastation of their bays, rivers and mountains by various industries.

From being an environmentally sound archipelago just a century ago with natural resources so vast and plenty, the Philippines is fast becoming an ecological disaster whose signs are now clearly seen in it’s people health, with breast cancer as the tip of the iceberg.

Wherever and whenever in the country the PBCN has conducted symposiums, the matter of health and the environment has not only clarified misconceptions but has also empowered women in taking strong actions to prevent their daughters from getting breast cancer.

“Ang Hinaharap ay Ipaglalaban!” 

With the establishment in 1997 of the Philippine Breast Cancer Network, which advocates a preventive approach towards the eradication of breast cancer, the landscape of breast cancer in the Philippines has significantly changed. Identifying and eliminating the causes of breast cancer has now become more urgent than seeking the cure.

Corollary to this, government and industry will sooner or later adhere to the Precautionary Principle – that of acting upon evidence rather than waiting for absolute proof. The medical profession will also sooner or later adhere to the patient’s Right to Informed Consent – that of full disclosure of all information and options, and most importantly, total respect for her decision.

Numerous scientific studies showing the environmental have already been presented in more than five World Conferences on Breast Cancer held in North America since 1997. Just a few days ago, the US Senate has passed the Safe Chemicals Act which shifts the burden of proof from government agencies to producers and manufacturers to prove their products are safe for public use and consumption.

In the Philippines? The current President would rather lift the ban on mining and simply provide funds for women who will get breast cancer!

Is this having more fun in the Philippines or is it just being funny in the Philippines?

Breast Cancer is no fun at all !!!

Over-diagnosis and over-treatment of breast cancer

The PBCN is deeply concerned with the absence of precautionary measures in the government’s Philippine Health Insurance Corporation’s Type Z Benefit Package, particularly in the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of breast cancer.

It has long been a reality in our country that poor or uninsured breast cancer patients receive little or minimal medical attention. This is the reason why the Department of Health launched in May 2011, the Patient Navigation Program to promote early breast cancer screening particularly among poor women and providing assured access to chemotherapy. The program is meant to show that breast cancer is a curable disease when detected, treated and managed early.

With the launching of the Type Z Benefit Package in the presence of President Noynoy Aquino in Malacanang Palace on July 2nd, members of PhilHealth will now be entitled to a package rate of P100,000 for the entire treatment course for early breast cancer. Coming from PhilHealth’s huge reserve fund of Php 30 billion, just 10% could easily cover 30,000 cases (more than double of government estimated cases in 2010). The opposite could then be the scenario for insured breast cancer patients who may likely be over-treated (receive drugs and procedures that can cause real harm) and even misdiagnosed.

Numerous studies have shown that early detection of breast cancer does not necessarily translate to saving more lives. Finding ever smaller cancerous lesions, even down to small clusters of cells can lead to over-diagnosis for if left alone but managed and observed over a period of time, would never have grown to endanger a woman’s life. Of the most common type of breast cancer, at least 50% of ductal carcinoma are non-invasive and can be safely managed without surgery or chemotherapy. Over-diagnosis leads to over-treatment.

For more than 15 years, the PBCN has seen all forms of misdiagnosis and mistreatments – unnecessary surgeries, chemotherapy and radiation. As a matter of fact, even among the ranks of medical practitioners there are varied, even opposing opinions in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. To address this, the leading breast cancer practitioners have just recently formed their own society to educate doctors and hopefully arrive at standardized protocols and treatments among themselves precisely to avoid misdiagnosis and mistreatment of breast cancer cases.

Today, one out of 13 women will develop breast cancer in her lifetime and not three out of 100 as stated by the Department of Health. In fact, one out of 49 is likely to die and not one out of every 100 as stated again by the DoH. This is why the Philippines is not only among the countries with the highest incidence rate of breast cancer in Asia but the highest!

According to the Department of Health, the breast cancer survival rate in the Philippines is below 40 percent but according to PhilHealth’s Robert So, MD – one of the reasons for selecting Jose Reyes Memorial Medical Center as its Reference Hospital is its experience of an 80% cure rate. This will be the lead hospital and along with the UP-PGH and the Philippine College of Surgeons will provide the standards and guidelines in the treatment of breast cancer.

Though standard treatment protocols/clinical guidelines shall be adopted from the current state of the art- internationally accepted treatment guidelines (such as the NCCN Cancer Treatment Guidelines updated each year) based on scientifically-sound body of evidence depicting the lowest recurrence rates, survival rates must be over a 5-year period and not only two years as stated - especially that early stages are mostly to be addressed. 

The Type Z Benefit Package will be implemented nationwide by contracted government hospitals in each region - all of which are training hospitals largely lacking in funds and personnel. The world's 3rd leading pharmaceutical, Paris-based Sanofi-Adventis agreed to extend an 83% discount for their chemo drug Docetaxel (from P40,000 to P6,930). With the advent of PhilHealth members availing of the P100,000 breast cancer package, these government hospitals can now expect a significant market share previously dominated by private hospitals. No longer hindered by costs, their doctors will not think twice in performing mastectomy, chemotherapy and radiation.

Precautionary measures must be instituted in the Type Z Benefit Package, particular to cases of breast cancer. These must include among others:

   1. How is a woman said to have breast    
       cancer?  Invasive or non-invasive? 
       Aggressive or not?

  
   2. How is a woman’s case said to require 
       surgery, chemotherapy and radiation? 
       

    3. When surgery is necessary, will it be a lumpectomy? 
    Modified or radical mastectomy? 

4. When chemo is considered necessary, how is a drug chosen? (by availability?) Will it be single or multiple chemo drugs? Will it be done before or after surgery? Will there be an oral maintenance chemo drug to be prescribed or not?

5. When radiation is considered necessary, will it be by linear    acceleration or cobalt?

6. And most important of all, has the total course of treatment been thoroughly explained to the patient (including limitations, risks and adverse reactions), not simply having her sign a lengthy form of consent without being fully informed?

These precautionary concerns are meant to prevent the over-diagnosis and over-treatment of breast cancer cases from the expected surge of patients resulting from the P100,000 package of PhilHealth’s Type Z Benefit Package launched on July 2nd, 2012. Only by the end of President Noynoy Aquino’s term in 2016, will it then be known whether or not PhilHealth’s well-meaning intervention in an economically and medically “catastrophic” disease like breast cancer will have realized better health outcomes or resulted in shorter survival rates and higher mortality rates.

.

A gamble, a test or a sign?

The scenarios of newly diagnosed women with breast cancer are almost always very similar. With shock and fear dominating the woman and her entire family, there is a rush for quick answers and solutions to a crisis never thought to come their way.

A visit to the hospital and a cancer specialist becomes the first step in the confusing web of breast cancer. Decisions are hurriedly done, assured by the most recent advances in science and medicine. The patient mainly relies on her attending physician.  But as the days and weeks go by, more questions arise and doubts of cure start trickling in. Entering the hospital for a sure cure has become like entering a casino to win a quick fortune. Having sufficient funds, whether savings or insurance is likened to having enough capital to gamble....and what first appeared to be low risk turns out to be high risk!  As they say, the casino never loses.....it's the gambler who will lose his shirt! A woman and her family bet all their money on perceived odds that surgery, chemotherapy and radiation would work.

For other patients though, they would rather not "gamble" but opt to try various options and alternatives that have been said to be of real benefit. This places much of the burden on the patient and her family. It will be a continuing search for positive experiences in curing breast cancer. With so much information from so many resources, the patient will test one after another for as long as her resources can manage to. From one experience to another, she will hope to conquer breast cancer with whatever may come her way and for as long as she does not turn for the worse. At the very least, testing non-toxic and non-invasive methods will not complicate or compromise her. "No harm - No foul!"

Yet in either scenario, it is only what is clear and visible to one's heart which will spell her journey in the unknown depths of breast cancer. There will always be events that will happen - good and bad - and most often it will be the sudden and unexpected ones beyond her control which will become crossroads for her. To resign from a job or not. To relocate residence or not. To let go of a troubled marriage or not. To continue chemo or not. To continue alternative treatment or not. To fight or to surrender. To live or to die.

There always will be signs.

A woman with breast cancer will have to reach out in the deepest bottom of her heart and soul for the very purpose of her life, that she may find strength and courage to confront the disease with full honor and dignity. Breast cancer is an environmental disease which is preventable. Like so many other victims today, she has become the one in thirteen women in the Philippines to get breast cancer. It was never her fault.

                       Breast Cancer is a sign of the times!

1 in 13 Filipino women will get breast cancer in her lifetime

The Philippines experienced the world’s highest increase of breast cancer incidence from the year 1980 to 2010 and today, the chances women of getting breast cancer is 1 in every 13.

In a recent study of 187 countries, global breast cancer incidence increased from 641,000 cases in 1980 to 1,643,000 cases in 2010 for an annual rate of increase of 3.1%. More than two-thirds of cases of breast cancer in 2010 were women aged 50 years and above - though most of whom were in developed countries with an increase of 104%, developing countries in this age range increased by 274%. For women between the ages of 15 and 49, there were twice as many breast cancer cases in developing countries with a 266% increase than in developed countries with only 63%.  A total of 425,000 women died from breast cancer - 68,000 of whom were between the ages of 15 and 49 in developing countries.

Among countries with not less than 10,000 cases in 2010, the Philippines ranked 11^th among the top 20 countries with the highest incidence rate of breast cancer and is now among the 6^th grouping of countries where 1 in every 13 women will get breast cancer. The Philippine risk of mortality is one in 49 cases.

The most alarming finding is that the Philippines registered the highest increase of 589% from 1980 to 2010. Compare this with the global increase of 256% with a risk incidence of 1 in 18, developing countries increase of 270% with 1 in 26 and that of Southeast Asia’s 479% increase with 1 in 20. North America continues to have the highest incidence rate of 1 in 8 followed by Western Europe and Australasia with 1 in 10.

On October 1^st will be held the 2^nd Annual Symposium of the newly formed Philippine Breast Cancer Society (PBCS) at the St. Luke’s Medical Center - Global City.  A society exclusively composed of medical doctors led by surgeons, oncologists and radiologists regarded as experts in the field of breast cancer, it must be asked of them why they continue to peddle expensive, unsuccessful and potentially carcinogenic technologies/treatments to the their patients. The breast cancer risk of mortality in the USA is 1 in 46 while that of Southeast Asia is 1 in 78 and yet they continue to ignore the healing benefits of non-toxic and non-invasive interventions. Shouldn’t they be looking at prevention along with safe methods of detection? Why has there been such an outrageous increase of breast cancer incidence despite of all recent trends in the medical science and all the programs of the Department of Heath and the Philippine Cancer Society? Why won’t they look at environmental and occupational exposures? Why do they consistently address the wrong questions?

The Philippine Breast Cancer Network (PBCN) fully supports the call to the UN and the WHO by over 100 scientists, health professionals, civil society representatives and other stakeholders, led by Dr Annie J Sasco and André Cicolella from France, to tackle the challenge of non-communicable diseases (particularly breast cancer) by global action, especially in low-and-medium income countries, including environmental health factors and occupational disease prevention.

Source of data: Study report of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) as published in the September 2011 issue of The Lancet medical journal. IHME was launched in 2007 with funding from Bill & Melinda Gates foundation and the State of Washington and is based in Seattle, Washington, USA. 
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(11)61351-2/fulltext